A rhyme originating in the 1600s later appeared in the Mother Goose
collection about the dietary habits of the Sprat household. The modern
version reads, “Jack Sprat could eat no fat, his wife could eat no lean;
and so, between the both, you see, they licked the platter clean.”
Obviously not desirable dinner guests, the Sprats are fine examples
of two extremes in dieting that have dominated the American weight loss
and healthy eating mania. Low-fat diets have long held the accepted
position of being the politically correct and clinically accepted diet.
The low-fat approach was originally developed to treat and prevent
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), commonly visualized by
cholesterol-laden plaques within the walls of large and small arteries
(blood vessels).1 The assumption was that by reducing the
dietary exposure to fat and cholesterol by discouraging the consumption
of meat, eggs, and dairy, serum (blood) cholesterol and triglycerides
(fat) would decrease and along with it, the risk of heart attack and
stroke.
Unfortunately, low-fat diets do not offer much benefit beyond what
would be gained from weight loss by any method. Limiting dietary
cholesterol does not address the de novo cholesterol produced by the body, which is the cause of high cholesterol in most people.
Along came the Atkins revolution, an antithetical approach that
claims to promote weight loss by restricting carbohydrates rather than
fat. Low-fat diets use the approach of reducing the caloric density of
the diet to reduce calorie intake; low-carbohydrate diets make it easier
for the body to break down and use stored fat for energy by reducing
insulin release. Though many assumed the opposite, no evidence of
unhealthy changes in cardiovascular markers has been noted. In fact,
some components of the lipid profile (fats and cholesterol) improve on
low-carbohydrate diets, suggesting they are at least as safe, and
possibly safer diets for people at risk for heart attacks and stroke to
follow.
The Atkins diet has phases, including the induction phase, which
severely restricts carbohydrate consumption. When carbohydrate intake is
below 20-30 grams per day, the body enters a state called ketosis.2
Weight loss is dramatic and rapid when ketogenic dieting is followed;
much of the early weight lost is water, as carbohydrate stores are
depleted. Over the long term, weight loss is slower, particularly as
people migrate to the more moderate parts of the diet. In time, there
appears to be little difference between the various types of diets
relative to the number of people who stay on the diet and the amount of
weight they lose and keep off.3-5
Many people get discouraged by slow weight loss, while some people
find the mental state associated with ketosis comforting, as a sign of
ongoing fat reduction. The brain is highly dependent upon blood sugar
and during ketosis, some people experience irritability and difficulty
performing mental tasks. However, over time, some people claim they are
sharper. Regardless, there is a definite subjective component to
ketosis— some people become so committed (obsessive?) that they test
their urine for ketones several times a day.
Ketogenic dieting can be followed long term. Many people do so
voluntarily; others are directed to do so by their physicians for
specific conditions, such as epilepsy.6 Some have suggested
that ketogenic dieting may not only be as effective as low-fat dieting
for weight loss, but more effective and safer. This belief is certainly
premature, as very few side-by-side studies have been done and none have
followed the subjects long enough to state so definitely.
Bodybuilders and Cardiovascular Health
Cardiovascular health is important for bodybuilders and anabolic
steroid-using athletes to consider, as certain anabolic-androgenic
steroids (AAS) are associated with adverse changes in cholesterol, and
heart attacks and heart failure are some of the most common causes of
sudden death or serious injury in this group. Elite bodybuilders and
many other AAS users have suffered heart problems. While it is not
possible to directly assign AAS as a contributing cause to these cases,
there is a strong base building due to several reasons:
• Use patterns of AAS— dose and duration of cycles— have changed.
• Polypharmacy (the use of multiple medications and/or the
administration of more medications than are clinically indicated,
representing unnecessary drug use) includes many other anabolic
biologics (growth hormones and cytokines) and potent lipolytics
(fat-reducers).
• The demographics of AAS users are aging.
‘Cardiovascular’ refers to the heart and the blood vessels. Heart
damage is most commonly caused by ischemia (oxygen deprivation) but can
also be electrical in nature, as the heartbeat is generated by an
internal conduction system that accelerates and decelerates to meet the
circulatory demand of the body. When the electrical signal is disrupted,
the heart does not beat efficiently or if the disruption is severe
enough, may not beat at all. Ischemic damage of the heart (and brain, as
well as other tissues) is often due to a buildup of plaque in the
arteries, but may also be due to inappropriate vasoconstriction (the
blood vessel squeezing shut, as seen in the skin when exposed to cold)
or not dilating (opening wider) when oxygen demand requires greater
blood flow. Many abusers of cocaine suffered heart attacks due to
coronary vasoconstriction, even though their arteries were perfectly
healthy.7
When ischemia is mild-to-moderate and long-term, the body grows new
blood vessels to shorten the distance between active cells and nearby
capillaries (the smallest blood vessels and the site where oxygen and
factors are diffuse back-and-forth to cells of the body).8 A
person who lives in the mountains likely has a higher capillary density
(a measure of how branched the circulation is to provide oxygen) than a
person who lives on the beach at sea level. Many endurance athletes
sleep in special chambers that mimic living in the mountains. This
increases their red blood cell supply (the cells that carry oxygen) by
stimulating the hormone erythropoietin, and likely stimulates new blood
vessel growth. Many cancer drugs kill tumors by shutting down blood
vessel growth, starving the malignant tumors of oxygen and nutrients.9
One final mechanism that affects the buildup of plaque in artery
walls is the ability of the blood vessel to maintain an intact lining.
Major blood vessels are designed not to leak, and do so by having a
lining that prevents red and white blood cells from escaping into the
surrounding tissue. With the constant flow of blood rushing through the
vessels, the lining wears away but is constantly replaced by new lining
cells. If these replacement cells were not available, plaque can more
easily build up under the lining in the artery walls.
Picture a pickup truck bed with a spray-on liner. If the liner gets
gouged, rust can develop in the underlying metal— unless a new layer of
spray-on lining covers the damage. If neglected, the rust spreads,
potentially causing significant damage.
Low-Carb Mice and Ketogenic Diets
This background is provided to put into context the relevance of a
newly-published study that unveils some heretofore-unrealized concerns
about ketogenic diets. A group of researchers at Beth Israel Hospital
and other facilities, all part of the Harvard Medical System, compared
the cardiovascular effect of three types of diets— all containing the
same amount of cholesterol— in mice bred to be capable of developing
atherosclerosis (plaque buildup).10 The standard chow was low
in fat and protein, being 65 percent carbohydrate. The second group
received a diet that mimics what most people in the United States
consume, (43/15/42— carbohydrate/protein/fat); and the last group was
provided with a low-carbohydrate diet of 12/45/43
(carbohydrate/protein/fat).
Mice do not develop atherosclerosis naturally, and the mice fed the
standard ‘mouse chow’ had clean arteries after 12 weeks. Mice fed the
Western diet had a significant amount of atherosclerosis and the
low-carb mice had even more, nearly twice as much.
In looking at the typical lab markers to explain these findings,
researchers discovered that there was no real difference in cholesterol,
bad cholesterol, or oxidized cholesterol between mice fed the Western
and low-carbohydrate diets. Both had a four-fold increase in serum
(blood) cholesterol compared to the standard diet. The low-carbohydrate
diet was not associated with any increase in oxidative damage (the
molecular damage that is protected against by antioxidants). Oxidative
damage is proposed to make blood vessels more susceptible to
atherosclerosis.11
Another factor involved in atherosclerosis is inflammation. The study
looked at two measures of inflammation and found the exact opposite of
what would be expected. The low-carbohydrate diet resulted in lower
measures of a specific marker for inflammation in the bloodstream— no
different from measurements taken from mice fed the standard diet who
had essentially no atherosclerosis.10
The mice fed the low-carbohydrate diet experienced a dramatic
decrease in the healing ‘replacement cells’ that normally repair the
blood vessel lining. The degree of decrease was greater than 80 percent
and also affected precursor cells in the bone marrow.10
Ironically, one hormone that stimulates the production of the
replacement cells, VEGF, actually increased in low-carbohydrate fed
mice.10,12 Failing to directly measure the replacement cells
(called endothelial progenitor cells, or EPC) and measuring VEGF instead
would misled a clinician to believe that low-carbohydrate dieting was
safer for cardiovascular health. The increase in VEGF may be a sign of
the body reacting to the EPC-lowering effect of the low-carbohydrate
diet in the mice.
EPC plays a role in new blood vessel growth, and corresponding to the
decrease seen with EPC, low-carbohydrate fed mice were unable to
respond to ischemia (oxygen deprivation).10,13 One of the
factors known to stimulate EPC growth (pAkt) is a ‘downstream’ molecule
in the insulin-signaling cascade. ‘Downstream’ means insulin turns on
one molecule, which turns on another, which turns on pAkt. Statin drugs
(Lipitor, for example), exercise, and estrogen have been shown to
counteract impaired EPC production.13 Low-carbohydrate fed
mice had significantly lowered insulin concentrations compared to other
diets, as would be expected. Type 2 diabetics who are insulin-resistant
also demonstrated impaired EPC production.14 Though this is not the entire reason EPC growth is impaired in low-carbohydrate diets, it likely plays a role.
Thus far, low-carbohydrate diets have been shown to markedly increase
atherosclerosis, even compared to high-fat diets. This is in a setting
that would not raise suspicion. In fact, many measures suggest that
cardiovascular health is improved with low-carbohydrate dieting. Also,
the ability of the circulatory system (blood vessels) to respond to
oxygen deprivation is seriously impaired.
This study did not look at ketogenic dieting, as the carbohydrate
content was high enough to prevent ketosis. Thus, it is difficult to
determine whether the same concerns would be present during ketogenic
dieting. However, another concerning observation has been noted during
ketogenic dieting that adds another level of risk.
One study published last year showed that people on a ketogenic diet
had impaired dilation, whereas those on a low-fat diet actually
demonstrated improved flow-mediated dilation and response to a dilating
drug. Similar impairment is again seen in people with insulin
resistance.15,16 This adverse effect may be exaggerated when
saturated fat is high, but the balance of research appears to suggest
that if mono- and polyunsaturated fats are consumed in sufficient
quantities and saturated fats are moderated, blood vessels should
respond more appropriately to dilating signals.17 Research
looking at non-ketogenic, low-carbohydrate diets do not demonstrate the
same defect, suggesting there may be different risks present during
ketosis.18-20
Moderation Is Sound Advice
This body of research is quite significant, even though it is from a
mouse study and has not been duplicated in humans, let alone in a second
mouse study. Many people follow a low-carbohydrate diet to reduce their
bodyweight, improve conditions associated with the Metabolic Syndrome
(high cholesterol, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, etc.) and
decrease cardiovascular risk. Further, some who are already at risk for
cardiovascular disease or even those in rehab after a cardiovascular
event may be following a low-carbohydrate diet, in the belief that it is
more effective for weight loss and poses no more (or even less) of a
risk to one’s cardiovascular health. Indeed, the blood work performed
during studies evaluating the various diets (including Atkins-like,
low-carbohydrate diets) suggest that these diets are as safe or safer
than the traditional low-fat diet.21 Yet, reports of individuals developing cardiovascular disease while following an Atkins-type plan have been published.22
Given the findings in this study, it is impossible to recommend
low-carbohydrate or ketogenic diets to those with a significant personal
or family history of cardiovascular disease. In fact, this data
supports the recommendation for moderate carbohydrate intake sufficient
to maintain a baseline insulin presence. The exact recommendation for
carbohydrates remains fuzzy at this time, but it appears that at least
60-100 grams per day of low-glycemic carbohydrates, along with an intake
of mono- and polyunsaturated fats to counterbalance saturated fat
intake, is the optimal diet plan. Excessive carbohydrate intake should
be avoided as well, suggesting that the age-old adage of moderation in
all things remains sound advice.
AAS-using bodybuilders and athletes should take note, as hidden
damage to the cardiovascular system may make the AAS-using individual
more susceptible to heart or brain damage, even sudden death. Certainly,
the inability of the circulatory system to develop new blood vessels to
feed working and growing muscle would be a detriment to the anabolic
effects of training.
There are many approaches to fat loss. Science, the media, and
policymakers have so long focused on the dangers of various weight-loss
drugs that the hidden dangers of (physiologically) extreme diets may
have been ignored.
References:1. Fishbein GA, Fishbein MC. Arteriosclerosis: rethinking the current classification. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2009 Aug;133(8):1309-16.
2. Aoki TT. Metabolic adaptations to starvation, semistarvation, and carbohydrate restriction. Prog Clin Biol Res, 1981;67:161-77.
3. Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2005 Jan 5;293(1):43-53.
4. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2007 Mar 7;297(9):969-77.
5. Frisch S, Zittermann A, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of carbohydrate-reduced or fat-reduced diets in patients attending a telemedically guided weight loss program. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2009 Jul 18;8:36.
6. Evangeliou AE, Spilioti M, et al. Branched Chain Amino Acids as Adjunctive Therapy to Ketogenic Diet in Epilepsy: Pilot Study and Hypothesis. J Child Neurol, 2009 Aug 17. [Epub ahead of print]
7. Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. Cocaine-induced acute myocardial infarction. Clin Med Res, 2007 Oct;5(3):172-6.
8. Yang HT, Prior BM, et al. Training-induced vascular adaptations to ischemic muscle. J Physiol Pharmacol, 2008 Dec;59 Suppl 7:57-70.
9. Ruegg C, Mutter N. Anti-angiogenic therapies in cancer: achievements and open questions. Bull Cancer, 2007 Sep 1;94(9):753-62.
10. Foo SY, Heller ER, et al. Vascular effects of a low-carbohydrate high-protein diet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009 Aug 24. [Epub ahead of print]
11. Kondo T, Hirose M, et al. Roles of Oxidative Stress and Redox Regulation in Atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2009 Sep 14. [Epub ahead of print]
12. Kang LN, Chen Q, et al. Decreased Mobilization of Endothelial Progenitor Cells Contributes to Impaired Neovascularization in Diabetes. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2009 Jun 16. [Epub ahead of print]
13. Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Risk factors for coronary artery disease, circulating endothelial progenitor cells, and the role of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Kidney Int, 2005 May;67(5):1672-6.
14. Cubbon RM, Kahn MB, et al. Effects of insulin resistance on endothelial progenitor cells and vascular repair. Clin Sci (Lond), 2009 Aug 3;117(5):173-90.
15. Phillips SA, Jurva JW, et al. Benefit of low-fat over low-carbohydrate diet on endothelial health in obesity. Hypertension, 2008 Feb;51(2):376-82.
16. Ardigo D, Franzini L, et al. Relation of plasma insulin levels to forearm flow-mediated dilatation in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol, 2006 Apr 15;97(8):1250-4.
17. Keogh JB, Grieger JA, et al. Flow-mediated dilatation is impaired by a high-saturated fat diet but not by a high-carbohydrate diet. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2005 Jun;25(6):1274-9.
18. Keogh JB, Brinkworth GD, et al. Effects of weight loss from a very-low-carbohydrate diet on endothelial function and markers of cardiovascular disease risk in subjects with abdominal obesity. Am J Clin Nutr, 2008 Mar;87(3):567-76.
19. Volek JS, Ballard KD, et al. Effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction vs low-fat diet on flow mediated dilation. Metabolism, 2009 Jul 24. [Epub ahead of print]
20. Keogh JB, Brinkworth GD, et al. Effects of weight loss from a very-low-carbohydrate diet on endothelial function and markers of cardiovascular disease risk in subjects with abdominal obesity. Am J Clin Nutr, 2008 Mar;87(3):567-76.
21. Samaha FF, Foster GD, et al. Low-carbohydrate diets, obesity, and metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2007 Dec;9(6):441-7.
22. Barnett TD, Barnard ND, et al. Development of symptomatic cardiovascular disease after self-reported adherence to the Atkins diet. J Am Diet Assoc, 2009 Jul;109(7):1263-5.
TRAIN WITH WAYNE
No comments:
Post a Comment